From Seedling to Forest
Practical restoration methods and their tradeoffs
Your Progress
Section 3 of 5Four Pathways to Recovery
Natural regeneration: cheapest, slowest, most biodiverse. Simply fence off degraded land from grazing, stop fires, and wait. Seed banks in soil sprout, birds/animals disperse seeds, native species return. Cost: ~$50/ha for fencing. Works best in tropical regions with nearby seed sources. Takes 5-10 years for tree canopy, 30-50 for mature forest. Examples: Costa Rica's pasture-to-forest transitions, Atlantic Forest regrowth in Brazil.
Assisted natural regeneration (ANR): guided recovery. Remove invasive species (vines, grasses competing with seedlings), plant starter species to provide shade, protect natural seedlings from herbivores. Cost: $200-500/ha. Accelerates recovery to 3-7 years. Used in Philippines (after logging), Ethiopia (church forests expansion), Australia (post-mining restoration). Balance: human intervention speeds process while maintaining ecological diversity.
Active tree planting: fastest carbon, but risks monocultures. Grow seedlings in nurseries, plant in rows at 1,000-2,000 trees/ha. Cost: $500-2,000/ha depending on species, terrain, labor. Carbon accumulation starts year 2-3. Challenges: survival rates 50-80% (drought, browsing, poor site prep), low diversity if single-species plantations. Good for degraded sites lacking seed sources, but avoid native grasslands—planting trees where they shouldn't be harms ecosystems.
Agroforestry: trees + crops/livestock for immediate income. Plant timber or fruit trees alongside agriculture—alley cropping, silvopasture, scattered paddock trees. Farmers earn income while carbon accumulates. Cost: $1,000-3,000/ha (higher because of agricultural inputs). Carbon less than pure forest but socially sustainable. Proven in: cocoa agroforestry (Ghana), coffee shade systems (Colombia), silvopasture (Australia). Policy support critical—farmers need secure land tenure and technical training.
Interactive Restoration Method Selector
Compare restoration approaches across cost, timeline, and suitability
Natural Regeneration
Let nature recover by protecting land from grazing/fire
Timeline: Year 0
Method Comparison Summary
| Method | Cost | Time to Carbon | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Regeneration | $ | Slow (5-10 yrs) | Degraded native forest |
| Assisted Natural | $$ | Medium (3-7 yrs) | Partially cleared land |
| Active Planting | $$$ | Fast (2-5 yrs) | Open/degraded areas |
| Agroforestry | $$$$ | Immediate | Active farmland |
💡 Key Insight
Monitor, adapt, protect—restoration is ongoing. Initial planting is 10% of the work. Must prevent fires (firebreaks, early burning), control invasives (continuous weeding), adjust species if failures occur, and legally protect from clearing for decades. Successful projects: long-term funding, community ownership, diversified income streams, adaptive management. Failures: plant-and-abandon, wrong species, no fire management, land tenure conflicts.