Choosing the Right Forest
Compare ecosystems, carbon storage, and co-benefits
Your Progress
Section 2 of 5Not All Forests Are Equal
Forest type determines carbon potential and co-benefits. Tropical rainforests store most carbon per hectare (~400 tC/ha) with fastest growth rates (4-5 tC/ha/year). But they're threatened by deforestation, require high rainfall, and face land-use conflicts. Temperate forests grow slower but offer stable, long-term storage with deep soil carbon. Boreal forests are slowest but store carbon in cold soils where decomposition is minimal.
Biodiversity varies dramatically. A single hectare of Amazon rainforest can contain 300+ tree species—more than all of North America. Boreal forests have just 5-10 species but support massive animal populations (caribou herds, migratory birds). Temperate forests balance diversity and biomass. Dryland forests have adapted species critical for arid ecosystems.
Water cycles matter for local climate. Tropical forests recycle 50-70% of rainfall through evapotranspiration—critical for downwind agriculture. Cutting Amazon forests reduces rainfall in Brazil's agricultural heartland. Temperate forests moderate floods by slowing runoff. Dryland forests recharge aquifers and prevent desertification. Water benefits often exceed carbon value locally.
Interactive Forest Ecosystem Comparator
Compare carbon storage, biodiversity, and water cycling across forest types
Tropical Rainforest
Hot & humid year-round
Amazon, Congo, SE Asia
Carbon Distribution
Annual sequestration rate: 4.5 tC/ha/year during peak growth
✓ Advantages
- •Highest carbon density
- •Maximum biodiversity
- •Year-round growth
- •High rainfall recycling
✗ Challenges
- •Deforestation pressure
- •Fire risk when cleared
- •Slow recovery if degraded
- •Land conflicts
💡 Key Insight
Context matters more than carbon density. Restoring degraded tropical peatland prevents emissions (peat oxidation releases CO₂) while sequestering carbon—double benefit. Planting trees in dry savannas can reduce water availability and harm native species. Best restoration: native species mixes matching historical ecosystems, not monoculture plantations. Ecological integrity + carbon = durable solution.