Storage Siting: Where to Build?
Understanding the complex challenges of locating energy storage facilities in the right places
Your Progress
Section 1 of 5The Storage Siting Challenge
Energy storage siting is one of the most complex challenges in the energy transition. Unlike traditional power plants, storage facilities can be located almost anywhere, but optimal placement requires balancing technical, environmental, economic, and social factors. Poor siting decisions can lead to higher costs, environmental damage, community opposition, and grid integration challenges.
Different storage technologies have vastly different siting requirements. Lithium-ion batteries can be deployed in urban environments, while pumped hydro requires specific topography. Compressed air storage needs underground caverns, and flywheels thrive in city centers. Understanding these requirements is crucial for successful project development.
Why Siting Matters
Proper siting can reduce costs by 20-50%, improve project timelines by months, and increase community acceptance. Poor siting can doom projects before they begin, regardless of the technology's technical merits.
Interactive Storage Technology Siting Matrix
Lithium-ion Batteries
Pumped Hydro Storage
Compressed Air Energy Storage
Flywheel Storage
Thermal Storage
Siting Criteria Matrix
Hover over criteria to see descriptions. Higher scores (5) are better for siting.
| Technology | Land Use Intensity | Environmental Impact | Community Acceptance | Grid Integration | Siting Cost | Scalability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
🔋Lithium-ion Batteries | 3 Moderate | 4 Good | 5 Excellent | 5 Excellent | 4 Good | 5 Excellent |
💧Pumped Hydro Storage | 1 Very Poor | 2 Poor | 2 Poor | 4 Good | 2 Poor | 3 Moderate |
💨Compressed Air Energy Storage | 2 Poor | 3 Moderate | 3 Moderate | 4 Good | 3 Moderate | 4 Good |
⚡Flywheel Storage | 4 Good | 5 Excellent | 4 Good | 5 Excellent | 4 Good | 2 Poor |
🔥Thermal Storage | 3 Moderate | 4 Good | 4 Good | 3 Moderate | 3 Moderate | 4 Good |