Types of Clusters

Comparing regional, sectoral, and innovation clusters across key dimensions

Three Cluster Archetypes

Not all clusters are alike. Regional clusters (Silicon Valley, Route 128) thrive on geographic proximityβ€”firms benefit from face-to-face networks, shared labor pools, and local institutions. Sectoral clusters (German Mittelstand, Italian ceramics) are defined by industry specialization, often spanning multiple regions but connected by supply chains and industry associations. Innovation clusters (Cambridge biotech, Shenzhen electronics) prioritize R&D intensity and knowledge creation, anchored by universities or national labs. Each type has distinct strengths: Regional clusters excel at rapid iteration and entrepreneurship. Sectoral clusters achieve deep technical expertise and incremental innovation. Innovation clusters drive breakthrough discoveries and radical technologies. Clean tech implications: Offshore wind clusters (Denmark, UK) are regional (port proximity matters). Battery clusters (China, South Korea) are sectoral (lithium supply chains). Fusion energy clusters (ITER, Commonwealth Fusion) are innovation-driven (plasma physics labs). Policy must match cluster type: Regional clusters need infrastructure; sectoral clusters need trade coordination; innovation clusters need R&D funding.

Interactive Cluster Comparison Heatmap

Compare cluster types across six key dimensions

πŸ—‚οΈ Interactive Comparison Matrix

Hover over cells to compare cluster types across key attributes. Darker = higher intensity.

Proximity
Specialization
Knowledge
Networks
Policy
Diversity
Regional
5
Very High
3
Moderate
3
Moderate
4
High
3
Moderate
4
High
Sectoral
2
Low
5
Very High
3
Moderate
4
High
4
High
2
Low
Innovation
4
High
3
Moderate
5
Very High
5
Very High
5
Very High
4
High
πŸ—ΊοΈ

Regional Clusters

Strength: Network Effects
Weakness: Industry Lock-in
Example: Silicon Valley tech, Shenzhen electronics
🏭

Sectoral Clusters

Strength: Deep Expertise
Weakness: Geographic Dispersion
Example: German automotive, Swiss pharma
πŸ”¬

Innovation Clusters

Strength: Breakthrough Tech
Weakness: Long Timelines
Example: Cambridge biotech, CERN physics

πŸ’‘ Key Insight

Successful clean tech clusters often combine all three types: Regional proximity for rapid prototyping, sectoral depth for supply chain efficiency, and innovation intensity for R&D breakthroughs. Denmark's offshore wind cluster is regional (Esbjerg port), sectoral (turbine supply chain), and innovation-driven (DTU research).

← Previous