DAC Technology Approaches

Comparing capture mechanisms and system designs

Four Technology Pathways

DAC technologies share a common challenge: capturing CO₂ from 420 ppm air (0.042%)—1,000x more dilute than flue gas from power plants. Liquid solvent systems use alkaline solutions: Air contacts potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution containing amines. CO₂ dissolves, forming carbonates. Solution reacts with calcium hydroxide to precipitate calcium carbonate pellets. Pellets are heated to 900°C (calcination) to release pure CO₂. Carbon Engineering's pilot in Canada captures 1 ton/day; planning 1 Mt/year facility. Chemistry is proven (used in ammonia production for decades), but calcination energy is the bottleneck. Solid sorbent temperature-swing uses functionalized materials: Air flows over solid filters coated with amine compounds that chemically bind CO₂ at ambient temperature. Chamber is sealed and heated to 80-120°C under vacuum, releasing CO₂. Climeworks' Orca plant in Iceland (4,000 t/year) uses geothermal heat for regeneration. Modular design allows staged deployment, but scaling requires thousands of units. Moisture-swing sorbents are the newest approach: Sorbent captures CO₂ when dry, releases it when exposed to moisture at just 40-60°C. Can use waste heat from industrial processes or low-grade geothermal. Global Thermostat demonstrated at pilot scale. Still early-stage—long-term sorbent stability unknown. Electrochemical systems use voltage-swing: Electrode materials (quinone-based) bind CO₂ when voltage is applied, release it when voltage is reversed. Fully electric (no heat), lowest energy penalty (0.8-1.5 GJ/t). Verdox, Captura developing at lab scale. Major advantage: can integrate directly with intermittent renewables. Challenge: electrode durability through millions of cycles.

Interactive DAC Technology Comparator

Compare different DAC approaches and watch their capture processes animate

💧 Liquid Solvent (Amine)

Carbon EngineeringCommercial pilot

🌬️
Step 1
Air Intake
💧
Step 2
CO₂ Absorption
Step 3
Pellet Formation
🔥
Step 4
Calcination
🗜️
Step 5
CO₂ Compression

Technical Specifications

capture Rate1 Mt/year (planned)
energy1.5-2.0 GJ/tCO₂
land Use1 ha/kt/year
water Use4-5 m³/tCO₂
capex$600-$800/tCO₂/year
opex$100-$200/tCO₂

Advantages

  • Proven industrial chemistry
  • High capture efficiency (90%+)
  • Can use waste heat
  • Continuous operation

Challenges

  • High temperature calcination (900°C)
  • Water intensive
  • Large footprint
  • Corrosive chemicals

Key Challenge

Energy: Calcination requires 900°C heat—hard to electrify

💡 Key Insight

No single DAC technology is clearly superior—context matters. Liquid solvents work best where high-temperature heat is available (near industrial sites, geothermal). Solid sorbents fit renewable-powered operations (Iceland, desert solar). Moisture-swing suits humid regions with waste heat. Electrochemical will dominate once mature (lowest energy, fully renewable). The race is on: liquid solvents are ahead today, but solid/electrochemical may leapfrog with innovation.

← Previous