Scaling to Gigatonnes
Can biochar remove billions of tons of CO₂ annually?
Your Progress
Section 4 of 5The Biomass Question
How much biomass exists—and how much can we use? Global estimate: ~120 billion tons of dry biomass annually from agriculture, forestry, and waste streams. But not all is available. Crop residues needed for erosion control, livestock feed competes with energy uses, and collection costs rise with distance. Practical availability: ~30-40 Gt/year without ecological harm.
Converting to biochar: yields 25-40% by weight. If we pyrolyzed 10 Gt/year at 30% efficiency → 3 Gt biochar. Each ton contains ~0.7 t carbon, equivalent to 2.6 t CO₂ sequestered for centuries. Result: ~8 Gt CO₂/year removal at 10% of feedstock potential. For context, global emissions (2023) were 37 Gt CO₂—biochar could offset 20%+ at scale.
Geographic distribution matters. Asia holds 40% of feedstock (rice husks, sugarcane bagasse), Africa 20% (crop residues, savanna biomass), Americas 25% (corn stover, forest thinnings). Deployment must match local feedstock, soil needs, and infrastructure. Kenya's Kakuzi farm uses coffee husks → biochar → coffee plantations (closed loop). India's rice-growing states could produce 50-100 Mt/year from straw burning alone.
Economic viability unlocks scale. At $500/ton biochar + $50/ton CO₂ carbon credits, revenues exceed costs for medium-large operations. But policy support needed—subsidies, streamlined permitting, ag extension services teaching farmers application methods. IPCC models include 0.5-2 Gt CO₂/year biochar removal by 2050 in 1.5°C scenarios—technically feasible, economically viable with right incentives.
Interactive Global Deployment Simulator
Explore regional feedstock potential and climate impact at different adoption levels
Deployment Scenario
All feedstock sources combined
Real-World Impact
Feedstock Sources
⚠️ Real-World Constraints
- Some residues needed for soil cover, livestock feed, or building materials
- Transportation costs limit economically viable collection radius (~50 km)
- Seasonal availability—storage and supply chain challenges
- Competing uses (biofuels, biogas, mushroom cultivation)
- Policy barriers—permitting, air quality regulations, land use restrictions
Realistic near-term potential (2030): ~10-20% adoption → 0.5-1 Gt CO₂/year removal
💡 Key Insight
Biochar isn't THE silver bullet—it's ONE of many. Combine with emissions reductions (clean energy, efficiency), reforestation, ocean-based CDR, and direct air capture for a portfolio approach. Gigatonne-scale deployment requires: (1) mechanized production systems, (2) carbon markets valuing permanence, (3) agronomic research proving crop yield gains, (4) supply chain infrastructure from feedstock → reactor → farm. Achievable by 2030-2040 with policy alignment.