📊 zk-SNARKs vs zk-STARKs: The Privacy Showdown
Compare the two dominant zero-knowledge proof systems
Your Progress
0 / 5 completed←
Previous
How ZK Proofs Work
🔍 Types of ZK Proofs
Three main types dominate production blockchains: SNARKs (smallest), STARKs (most transparent), and Bulletproofs (balanced). Each has trade-offs.
🎮 Interactive: Compare ZK Proof Systems
Select a ZK proof type to see detailed specifications and trade-offs
⚡
ZK-SNARKs
Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge
Small proofs, fast verification, requires trusted setup
Proof Size
~200 bytes
Verify Time
~1-10ms
Generate Time
~seconds
Trusted Setup
Required
Quantum Safe
No
✅ Advantages
- • Smallest proof size (200 bytes)
- • Fastest verification (milliseconds)
- • Battle-tested (Zcash since 2016)
- • Widely adopted in production
⚠️ Disadvantages
- • Requires trusted setup ceremony
- • Vulnerable to quantum computers
- • Complex cryptography
- • Hard to audit
🚀 Used By
▸Zcash (private transactions)
▸Tornado Cash (mixing)
▸Mina Protocol (22KB blockchain)
▸Filecoin (storage proofs)
⚖️ Quick Comparison Matrix
| Feature | SNARKs | STARKs | Bulletproofs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proof Size | ★★★ Smallest | ★ Largest | ★★ Medium |
| Verify Speed | ★★★ Fastest | ★★ Fast | ★ Slower |
| Trusted Setup | Required | None | None |
| Quantum Resistance | No | Yes | No |
| Production Ready | Yes (2016+) | Yes (2021+) | Yes (2017+) |
🎯 Which One to Choose?
⚡
Choose SNARKs if:
Need smallest proofs, fastest verification. Okay with trusted setup. Use case: privacy coins (Zcash), blockchain compression (Mina).
🛡️
Choose STARKs if:
Need transparency (no trusted setup), quantum resistance. Scaling is priority. Use case: Layer 2 rollups (StarkNet), large computations.
🎯
Choose Bulletproofs if:
Need range proofs (prove value in range without revealing). Privacy focus. Use case: confidential transactions (Monero), payment amounts.