Previous Module
Quadratic Voting Game

🔒 Security Models: AccessControl vs Ownable

Compare OpenZeppelin patterns for smart contract permissions

Design access control for DAO operations

🛡️ Permission Security Models

There's no one-size-fits-all security model. Early DAOs might use single admin for speed. Growing DAOs adopt multi-sig for safety. Mature DAOs layer on-chain governance, guardians, and role separation. The right model depends on treasury size, operational tempo, and decentralization values. Most production DAOs use hybrid approaches: multi-sig for treasury, time-locks for upgrades, guardians for emergencies, and governance for major decisions.

🎮 Interactive: Security Model Comparison

Compare different security models to understand trade-offs between speed, security, and decentralization. Choose the right model for your DAO's needs.

👤 Single Admin

One address has full control. Fast execution but single point of failure.

✓ Advantages
  • Fastest execution (no coordination)
  • Clear decision-making authority
  • Simple implementation
  • Low gas costs
⚠️ Disadvantages
  • Single point of failure (key compromise = game over)
  • No checks and balances
  • Centralization risk
  • Requires complete trust
🎯 Best For

Early-stage projects, testing, low-value DAOs, or when speed trumps security.

💼 Real Example

Small NFT project with trusted founder holding admin key during initial development.

🎯 Choosing the Right Model

💰
Treasury Size Matters

<$100K: Single admin acceptable. $100K-$1M: 3/5 multi-sig minimum. $1M-$10M: 5/9 multi-sig + time-locks. >$10M: Multi-sig + on-chain governance + guardian system. More value = more security layers.

Operational Speed Requirements

High-frequency trading protocol? Need fast execution (multi-sig or guardian). Slow-moving investment DAO? On-chain governance works fine. Match security overhead to operational tempo. Don't use 7-day governance votes for daily operations.

🎭
Trust Assumptions

Known doxxed team? Multi-sig with those individuals. Anonymous contributors? Require on-chain governance. Less trust available = more decentralization needed. Can't sue anonymous admin if they rug, so remove admin powers entirely.

🚀
Maturity Stage

Launch phase: Single admin for rapid iteration. Growth phase: Multi-sig as assets accumulate. Mature phase: Full governance + guardian hybrid. Progressively decentralize as risk/stakes increase.

🔄 Migration Paths

Most DAOs evolve through security models as they mature. Here's the typical progression:

1️⃣
Single Admin Launch
Quick deployment, founder control, $0-100K treasury
2️⃣
3/5 Multi-Sig
Add core contributors, distribute risk, $100K-1M treasury
3️⃣
Multi-Sig + Time-Locks
Add transparency layer, 48h review window, $1M-10M treasury
4️⃣
Full Governance + Guardian
Token voting for major decisions, guardian for emergencies, $10M+ treasury

💡 Key Insight

The "best" security model is the one you'll actually use. On-chain governance is theoretically most decentralized, but if it takes 10 days to execute a bug fix, your DAO might get exploited first. Multi-sig is more centralized but pragmatic. Perfect security that's too slow is useless security. Real-world DAOs use hybrid systems: multi-sig for routine operations (fast), time-locked governance for upgrades (transparent), and guardian for emergencies (reactive). Layer security mechanisms to match threat models and operational realities. Pragmatism > purity.

← Role Assignment