Anatomy of an Agent
Learn the core components that make up an AI agent and how they work together
Your Progress
0 / 5 completedPractical Application
See how real production systems architect their agentsβfrom ChatGPT to GitHub Copilot. Learn what works at scale.
Production Agent Architectures
π¬
ChatGPT Plugins
OpenAI's agent system
Component Choices:
- β’ Reasoning: GPT-4 (best quality)
- β’ Memory: Conversation history (short-term)
- β’ Tools: 70+ plugins (web search, calc, Wolfram)
- β’ Loop: Modified ReAct with parallel tool calls
Why These Choices:
- β’ Quality matters more than cost (consumer product)
- β’ No long-term memory (privacy concerns)
- β’ Many tools = versatility (general assistant)
- β’ Parallel calls = faster multi-step tasks
Performance: 2-5s per response, $0.05-0.20 per conversation
π¨βπ»
GitHub Copilot
Microsoft's coding assistant
Component Choices:
- β’ Reasoning: Codex (code-specialized model)
- β’ Memory: Editor context + project files
- β’ Tools: File read/write, LSP, terminal
- β’ Loop: Plan-Execute (predictable coding tasks)
Why These Choices:
- β’ Specialized model = better code quality
- β’ Project context = relevant suggestions
- β’ Few targeted tools (no web search needed)
- β’ Plan-Execute fits structured coding workflows
Performance: 100-500ms per suggestion, optimized for latency
πΌ
Intercom Fin
Customer support agent
Component Choices:
- β’ Reasoning: GPT-4 fine-tuned on support data
- β’ Memory: Long-term (vector DB of past tickets)
- β’ Tools: Ticket search, KB lookup, escalation
- β’ Loop: ReAct with human-in-loop for escalations
Why These Choices:
- β’ Fine-tuning = consistent brand voice
- β’ Past tickets = faster resolution (learned fixes)
- β’ Narrow tool set = reliable, domain-specific
- β’ Human escalation = safety net for edge cases
Performance: 3-8s per ticket, 70% autonomous resolution rate
Common Patterns Across Production Systems
β Always Include
- Max iterations: Every production agent has hard limits (10-30)
- Timeouts: Kill runaway tasks (30-120s typical)
- Error handling: Graceful degradation, not crashes
- Logging: Every LLM call, tool execution logged
- Cost tracking: Monitor spend per user/task
β‘Performance Optimizations
- Caching: Cache tool results (weather valid for 30min)
- Parallel calls: Execute independent tools simultaneously
- Model tiers: GPT-4 for planning, GPT-3.5 for execution
- Streaming: Stream responses for perceived speed
- Prefetching: Load likely-needed context early
οΏ½Safety Measures
- Sandboxing: Code execution in isolated containers
- Rate limiting: Max N API calls per minute
- Input validation: Schema checking before tool calls
- Human approval: Require confirmation for destructive actions
- Audit trails: Full logs for compliance/debugging
πMonitoring Metrics
- Success rate: % of tasks completed successfully
- Latency: P50, P95, P99 response times
- Cost per task: Total LLM + tool costs
- Tool usage: Which tools called most often
- Error types: Categorize and track failure modes
Decision Framework: Choosing Components
Answer these questions to architect your agent:
1. What's your quality vs cost vs speed priority?
- β’ Quality first: GPT-4, long-term memory, Reflexion loop
- β’ Speed first: GPT-3.5/Claude, no memory, simple ReAct
- β’ Cost first: Llama 3 (self-hosted), short-term only, Plan-Execute
2. Are tasks predictable or exploratory?
- β’ Predictable: Plan-Execute (booking flights, data processing)
- β’ Exploratory: ReAct (research, debugging, creative tasks)
- β’ Error-prone: Reflexion (API integrations, web scraping)
3. Do you need context from past interactions?
- β’ No: No memory (stateless Q&A, calculations)
- β’ Within session: Short-term memory (multi-turn conversations)
- β’ Cross-session: Long-term memory (personalized assistants, support)
4. How many tools does the agent need?
- β’ 1-5 tools: Specialized agent (code assistant, booking bot)
- β’ 5-15 tools: General assistant (ChatGPT, virtual assistant)
- β’ 15+ tools: Split into multiple specialized agents
π―Getting Started: Recommended Stack
For 80% of use cases, start with this proven combination:
Reasoning: GPT-4 (plan) + GPT-3.5 (execute) for cost efficiency
Memory: Short-term conversation context (add long-term later if needed)
Tools: 3-7 focused tools for your domain
Loop: ReAct (flexible, debuggable, works for most cases)
Guardrails: Max 20 iterations, $5 budget, 60s timeout
β¨ This stack handles customer support, code assistance, research, and most business workflows.